AI-powered academic literature assistant

Submit a topic.
Get a review you can verify.

ScoutLit retrieves papers from arXiv and Semantic Scholar, synthesizes a structured literature review with inline citations, and shows you the sources behind each section — so you can inspect, not just read.

ScoutLit is currently in private beta. We're working with a small group of researchers to refine the product before broader availability.

From topic to traceable review

No manual database searching. No copying abstracts into a chatbot. ScoutLit runs the full retrieval-to-synthesis pipeline and hands you something you can actually work with.

  1. 01
    Search
    Any research question or keyword. ScoutLit handles the search strategy.
  2. 02
    Retrieve
    Concurrent arXiv + Semantic Scholar fetch, deduplicated by DOI and title.
  3. 03
    Classify
    Each paper labeled Seminal, Foundational, Recent, or General — no LLM needed.
  4. 04
    Synthesize
    Structured review with inline [Author et al., Year] citations and research gaps.
  5. 05
    Evaluate
    Groundedness scored 0–100. Unsupported sentences flagged explicitly.
  6. 06
    Continue
    Inspect cited sources, refine your review, export your work, and return to it later from any device.
Literature Review
Research Gaps
Sources

The transformer architecture, introduced by [Vaswani et al., 2017], replaced recurrent networks with self-attention, enabling parallelization across sequence positions. Scaled dot-product attention computes compatibility between query and key vectors [Vaswani et al., 2017], producing weighted sums of value representations [Brown et al., 2020].

⚠ Not directly supported by retrieved sources Transformers have become the dominant paradigm across nearly all domains of modern machine learning.
Example groundedness score 87%
Illustrative example — not a published benchmark.

Know what the AI based it on

Most AI writing tools give you output without attribution. ScoutLit is built around the opposite: inline citations connect review content to retrieved papers, a groundedness score tells you what fraction of sentences are supported, and flagged sentences show exactly where the model went beyond the source material. Browse the cited sources for each section without leaving the review.

This isn't just a transparency feature. It's how you decide whether to trust the review.

  • Inline citations connect review content to retrieved papers
  • Unsupported sentences flagged, not hidden
  • 0–100 groundedness score per review

Tested with researchers

In ScoutLit's first researcher pilot, participants responded positively to the product's usefulness, source-inspection experience, and potential for continued use. Their feedback is also shaping improvements to retrieval precision and performance.

Pilot 01 · 8 analyzed participants · September 2026

Built for people who work with research literature

Built for research you need to stand behind.

Academic researchers

Graduate students & faculty

Conducting literature reviews for dissertations, grant applications, or research area exploration. Needs traceable citations, not plausible-sounding summaries.

PhD students Postdoctoral researchers Faculty Systematic reviewers
Research support

Librarians & research teams

Research librarians, coordinators, and evidence synthesis teams who help researchers navigate and synthesize academic literature efficiently.

Research librarians Research coordinators Evidence synthesis teams
R&D professionals

Industry researchers

Technical teams who need to survey the academic literature before building — without a dedicated research librarian or weeks of manual searching.

R&D teams Applied researchers Technical leads
Policy & analysis

Analysts & strategists

Policy analysts, think tanks, and strategy teams who need evidence-grounded literature coverage to inform decisions and public-facing documents.

Policy analysts Think tanks Strategy teams

Research with confidence

ScoutLit is in private beta.

We're working with a small group of researchers and research professionals to refine ScoutLit before broader availability. Apply to join the private beta and help shape how ScoutLit supports evidence-accountable research.

  • Currently available by invitation